Friday, 12 February 2010
Celebrity versus Common Sense Poor?
Ready Sarah? "Em not sure" Gordon "do I wear the pink or the black or is it purple is that the women's colours?" "No idea but do hurry we have a camera to face and do do look your best!" Thousands of women just as beautiful as Sarah,Cherie, Hilary,Diana and others (actually I think Audrey Hepburn beats them all) will have no occassion to wear a pretty dress or their husbands no audience to collect a massive fee for their after dinner speeches- No poor people=no charities to collect for=no need for pretty dresses. But there is a need for all and that is an Education with information to free women from bodies that won't function and a system which seems to be at war. Have you noticed that all these programmes are run by rather well heeled people who need an audience you THE POOR without you there's no programme. No need for hospitals or charities (that's why I personally like Primark a fantastic opportunity to buy and express your own personality) Think!?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sounds a lot like Conflict Theory. Take it one step further though.
ReplyDeleteNo poor = no powerful government. They need poor to be in power.
You are right. But what people have forgotten is the power they have to influence governments. What we met in the past and are still meeting today is a lack of monitoring of elected governments by the people who exercised their right to vote. How do we address it effectively.
ReplyDelete